Shout! Factory Announces MST3K Vs. Gamera

Last Thanksgiving – in honor of “Turkey Day” (the annual marathon of Mystery Science Theater 3000 which Comedy Central used to air, back in the early 90’s) – Shout! Factory announced that they were going to be releasing a box set of all five cult-classic MST3K Gamera episodes.  That was an informal announcement, but now it’s officially official, with a release date and everything.  Satellite News, the MST3K news source, has let it be known that the tin-boxed MST3K vs. Gamera 5-DVD set will bow on August 2nd.  They’ve also announced the extras.  In addition to the fully-riffed feature films Gamera, Gamera vs. Barugon, Gamera vs. Gaos, Gamera vs. Guiron, and Gamera vs. Zigra (all featuring host Joel Hodgson, now fronting Cinematic Titanic), you can expect:

* So Happy Together: A Look Back at MST3K and Gamera
* Gamera Vs. The Chiodo Brothers
* Gamera Obscura: A Brief History by August Ragone (author of Eiji Tsuburaya: Master of Monsters)
* Original Japanese Trailers
* 5 limited edition mini-posters by artist Steve Vance
[UPDATE 5/5] Shout! has confirmed the MST3K Hour wraps, hosted by Mike Nelson, will be included as well.
These were among the best episodes of MST3K, and now that the elusive DVD rights have finally been nailed down by Shout, MSTies who didn’t catch them when they originally aired – or have only watched them via low-quality fan tapes two decades old – can at last see what they’ve been missing.  Don’t expect Godzilla vs. the Sea Monster anytime soon, though.  Toho’s a bit protective of the big green lizard…but we all know that rocket-powered flying turtles are way cooler.

Posted in The Lobby | Comments Off on Shout! Factory Announces MST3K Vs. Gamera

American Raspberry (1977)

During the 70’s, satirical, irreverent, and mildly smutty sketch comedy movies glutted the marketplace.  Woody Allen’s  Everything You Ever Wanted to Know About Sex But Were Afraid to Ask (1972) and the John Landis/Zucker Brothers collaboration The Kentucky Fried Movie (1977) are the two that everyone remembers, but they’re also among the few that anyone is still willing to watch.  More hazily recalled are The Groove Tube (1974), The Boob Tube (1975), Tunnelvision (1976), and Can I Do It ‘Till I Need Glasses? (1977), just a few of the many disposable entries in this subgenre whose apex, it seems, was actually the TV series Saturday Night Live in 1975, which made further sketch comedy films feel somewhat unnecessary.  Still, you couldn’t say “fuck” on SNL (well, Charles Rocket did, but he got fired), so I guess someone needed to keep making these things, and here’s American Raspberry.

The premise is that one day every TV channel begins to air outlandish and offensive programming (the many, many skits and parodies, of course).  Some Americans are amused, others are outraged; one sketch even starts a race riot.  The President and his cabinet argue over what they should do, but inevitably they turn toward the screen, dazedly, and we (just as dazed and weary) watch another sketch.  Eventually, the world blows up.  Because of R-rated television, which is what would happen, don’t you know.

I can sum up the problem with American Raspberry very efficiently: it’s not funny.  Or, at least, about 90% of it is not.  The sketch show is a sturdy old format for a reason, which is that if a joke does not work, you can move on to the next, and then the one after that.  You don’t need to commit to anything for too long.  Not all of Monty Python’s Flying Circus (1969-1974) was hysterical, but proportionally they got it right.  Similarly, the Zucker Brothers’ gags in The Kentucky Fried Movie and Airplane (1980) are inconsistent as hell, but what did work was strong enough that you remember it.  American Raspberry cannot achieve lift-off.  Through one sketch after another, nothing terribly funny occurs.  Part of the problem is that the parodies are not much more than parodies: you are meant to recognize that a popular commercial is being spoofed, and that’s supposed to be enough. (This is still an issue in commercial comedies today, notably Scary Movie and all its bastard children.) The other problem is that the writers (Stephen Feinberg, John Baskin, Roger Shulman, and Bradley R. Swirnoff, who also directed) are too easily satisfied with the “fuck you” joke.  The “fuck you” joke is pretty easy to tell.  Basically, set it up with whatever you want; the punchline is always “fuck you.”  Applied with discretion, this humor can work.  But otherwise it tends to fall flat, and the reason is simple: it’s not terribly clever.

Take the first sketch, a commercial for “Trans Puerto Rico.”  Our hostess escorts us through the plane, and we’re treated to gags such as: the plane has a ceiling fan instead of air conditioning; the pilots are drinking tequila; there is a giant crucifix hanging on the wall; a passenger is stowing the dead body of a loved one in the overhead compartment; a man brings a chicken aboard, and when the stewardess tells him he has to leave it behind, he immediately breaks its neck.  Ha ha, Puerto Ricans are funny, even on an airplane.  Fuck you! But this passes as one of the stronger bits in the film, because at least it’s a concept that’s developed a few feet past its original premise.  Most are simply super-brief gags that don’t actually seem to develop into a complete comedy premise.  For example, there’s a commercial for a religious game show, with all the contestants lined up Last Supper-style.  The narrator says: “Hi, this is Johnny Jones, a religious fantatic who is crucified and then rises from the dead!  Do you buy that?  See if our contestants will, tonight on ‘Hook, Line & Sinker.'”  End sketch.  And fuck you.

Hey, it was the 70’s.  The counterculture had grown cynical, and a lot of the humor was like this: offensive for the sake of being offensive, with no “jokes” per se.  You can trace this back to the underground comix of the 60’s, many of which were juvenile, sexist, and racist; but that was the point.  They were intended to be transgressive – to jolt you awake, man.  About a year ago I visited an exhibit of 60’s and 70’s comix art at a local museum, and those peering through the glass to read the comic strip panels were either aghast, offended, or giggling nervously, as though afraid someone might catch them enjoying it.  (Well, there were others who were appraising each page with all the seriousness of studying a Monet, which is perhaps the only inappropriate way of approaching R. Crumb drawings of little men sodomizing headless giantesses.)  After spending a couple of hours in the exhibit, I was starting to feel a bit exhausted myself; there was also a feeling of: okay, every taboo has been violated…so what do you say now?  And that leads you to the 70’s, with the censorship of the Hays code long forgotten and pornography prevalent, and even briefly respectable; the shock was starting to wear off, and something needed to take its place.  From the influential Harvard Lampoon to the work of experimental comedians like Andy Kaufman and Michael O’Donoghue, you can feel a kind of exploration taking place, a trailblazing which, in retrospect, had to occur, in order to lead, decades on, to the extra-meta subversiveness of The Colbert Report and South Park.  In the 70’s, comedians were asking: what’s out of bounds, if anything?  What if you don’t have punchlines; what if you don’t have a joke?


American Raspberry heads down that trail not like a pioneer, but like a particularly grating follower a few steps behind, who’s first on the list to get eaten for supper should the food supply run out.  The film is eager to offend, but as though that were the only prize.  It’s like Michael Richards using the n-word and thinking that makes him Lenny Bruce.

But I’m being unfair.  There are a couple of funny things here.  I took some amusement out of the following sketch, but that might only be because it has Harry Shearer in it, in a very early cameo.  I’m still uncertain if it’s funny without the Harry Shearer, or without the novelty of containing a face I recognize.  But I was halfway through this film and starting to get desperate.

A couple of sketches just begin to land a joke before they cut away, or spoil it with an unfunny punchline. One bit, involving “5th-year abortions,” depicts a married couple happily giving away their rambunctious five-year-old to a death squad that arrives at their home. The performances almost elevate the material. Ditto the “sexual perversions” telethon, in which, at one point, the teary, cross-dressing emcee begins to get whipped by his co-host, and he mutters to her miserably, “Don’t try to cheer me up.” Some sketches are saved by hasty editing, such as the “fire the handicapped” commercial, or a bizarre, seconds-long bit featuring a poodle religious leader.

The single funniest scene in the film – the one which actually made me laugh, a function which I’d worried my body had forgotten how to perform – is a commercial for a menstrual pontoon called “Clampex.”  I showed it to my wife the next morning to make sure that it was funny, and that I hadn’t just laughed as some kind of survival mechanism to make it to the end of the film.  She confirmed that it was not a symptom of psychosis, and that there is actual humorous content in this clip.

Look, look, it’s comedy!  Note the (just brief enough to be perfectly timed) diagram of the vagina, sufficiently intimidating, and including mythological beasts Scylla and Charybdis (as well as cannelloni).  And the beautifully pointless direction to “pretend the room is a huge vagina.”  And: “Think of it as a puzzle.  Relax, and begin all over.”  Comedy!  The stuff of life – or, at least, what motion picture comedies are actually intended to contain!

During the ending credits, I was dismayed, if not surprised, to learn that this was a piece borrowed from National Lampoon, and written by Emily Prager, who was not one of the American Raspberry screenwriters.  That’s right, the one thing in the film I find to be truly clever and funny, and it’s not even original to this film.

Oh well.  If all I got out of this seventy-minute film was one minute of comedy gold, perhaps that’s a bargain.  (No, no, it isn’t.)

Posted in Theater Psychotronic | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

Slave Girls (1967)

There is a single brief scene in Slave Girls (1967) which perhaps explains why the film exists. Martine Beswick, the Jamaican-born actress who posed, strutted, and wrestled her way through From Russia With Love (1963), Thunderball (1965), and One Million Years B.C. (1966), writhes upon her animal-skin-covered bed in nothing but her itty-bitty underwear, making looks toward our white hunter hero (Michael Latimer) that are not so much “come hither” as they are “I want to devour you by my gnashing white teeth.”  There is a film surrounding this little moment, ninety minutes of it, but you probably won’t remember it.

Hammer Studios filmed this B-picture hastily after the big-budget One Million Years B.C., utilizing the same fur-bikini costumes, in hopes of stretching their dollar.  It’s an impoverished production, filmed on sets that look like sets, behind backdrops that look like flat and unconvincing.  The special effects aren’t so special, either, unless you’re counting Ms. Beswick herself.  Studio honcho Michael Carreras both wrote and directed the film, and although his efforts for Hammer were often ham-fisted, this is one of his clumsiest.  The dialogue and plot are hopelessly outdated, the politics are questionable, and the direction is, at times, amateurish.  Perhaps attempting to make his sets seem grander than they are, he shoots in CinemaScope, and physical and spatial distortions abound.  When he lets the camera pan, the sets and actors seem to become two-dimensional and queasily stretch and ripple across the screen.  This would be fine if the entire film was meant to be a dream, and I suppose you could argue that it is, since the plot features a character thrown backward in time.  But I would counter-argue that the film does not know what it wants to be.

Because of the costumes, and its alternate title Prehistoric Women, the film is often grouped with Hammer’s other prehistoric adventures: its Ray Harryhausen predecessor, as well as When Dinosaurs Ruled the Earth (1970) and Creatures the World Forgot (1971).  But it fits more comfortably into Hammer’s H. Rider Haggard fantasy series She (1965) and Vengeance of She (1968), and earlier colonialist adventures like The Stranglers of Bombay (1959).  I like some of those films, but by 1967 the formula was feeling increasingly out of time.  While the civil rights struggle was still raging in the United States, over in London’s Elstree Studios Hammer was dressing black actors in generic African native costumes and making them sing and dance in choreographed numbers straight out of the 1933 King Kong.  There’s also the unfortunate fact that the plot, such as it is, spirals inevitably toward a groan-worthy climax of racial panic as black men in costumes of shaggy black fur try to rape white women.  This might be more troubling if the entire film weren’t so absurdly naive, as though Carreras hadn’t read anything but 1930’s pulp fiction his entire life, and regurgitated those themes into a script, with no apparent desire to modernize the sensibilities.  Indeed, there are more genuinely offensive Hammer pictures in the fold (Terror of the Tongs).  We can, I think, just dismiss this one as silly and dated.  After all, it’s a film in which women worship a white rhino statue, a dull prop standing proudly in the center of the set as though  proclaiming that money was spent on it and so we will look at it.  It’s a film in which every few minutes we’re treated to a dance sequence, until one female Amazonian complains to Beswick that she just can’t dance anymore, because her heart isn’t in it (her friend was just murdered).  Beswick is unmoved, so another dance begins, this to a much more downbeat tune.  It’s a film in which our white-male-hunter-hero-clod-fellow becomes inexplicably smitten with just one of the many, many blonde tribeswomen, and firmly rebuffs every advance Beswick makes, even though those advances are made in overtly sexual dance numbers.  In short, this is a movie that wants to be a musical.  A musical directed by John Waters.  Instead, it takes itself very, very seriously.

The women rule over the men, you see, and Beswick wants her new time-traveling guest to be both her lover and her servant.  If he refuses, he’ll be thrown in with the other males, all chained up in a cave somewhere.  But to accept means being the one who will fetch her robe after she’s done taking a prehistoric bubble bath (I’m not kidding), grind up her perfumes, and allow her to ravish him.  All of this seems far too much to demand of his dignity, even though there doesn’t seem to be a great deal else to do in this far-flung land beneath the rhino-shaped mountain painted onto that backdrop over there.  Meanwhile, Beswick is making one sacrifice after another to the rhino statue, passing off some of her slave girls to the aforementioned black tribesmen, who hide behind rhino masks that look like something from Julie Taymor’s Lion King musical.

So I’m not sure what this is, precisely.  Time travel fantasy?  Jungle adventure, prehistoric survival story, pulp fiction wet dream?  Hammer was often old-fashioned, but what makes its better films so well-loved is that they would find ways to bring them up to date: make them bloody, sexy, exciting, classy, and intelligent.  (Slave Girls was released on a double bill with The Devil Rides Out, which is all of those things.)  Carreras’ film throws everything into the mix except for what it really needs to spark everything to life, and as a result, it tumbles over into unintentional hilarity.  Which might not be such a bad thing.

Posted in Theater Fantastique | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Slave Girls (1967)